Agenda and minutes

            Apologies for inability to attend were reported from Councillors Campbell, Crozier, Kyle, McCausland and Rodgers.

In pursuance of the Committee’s decision of 12^th August, to undertake a visit to the Ulster Hall following its recent refurbishment

            Pursuant to its decision of 12th August, the Committee undertook a visit to the Ulster Hall to view the building following its recent refurbishment.

Building Refurbishment

            The Members were given a tour of the Hall during which Mr. Stelfox answered questions from the Members.  He explained that, due to the poor condition of the roof over a lengthy period of time, a considerable quantity of water had got into the building, particularly in the voids within the walls.  However, following the refurbishment work, he was confident that this problem had been rectified.  He pointed out to the Members a few locations within the building which were stained as a result of salts in the water being left behind whilst the walls were drying out.  He stated that, due to the thickness of some of the walls, it may take up to two years for them to dry out completely.  Mr. Stelfox informed the Members that a number of notices had been installed throughout the building which explained the situation to the public and that these had resulted in a decrease in the number of negative comments regarding the damp patches on the walls.  He indicated that the contractor would be responsible for making good any defect, including areas of dampness, reported within a year of the handover.

            The Director of Improvement informed the Members that, since all of the Council’s contracts contained a retention clause, an amount of money would be withheld from the contractor which had been responsible for the refurbishment of the Ulster Hall until the Council was content with the work which had been undertaken.

Mulholland Organ

            The Head of City Events and Venues informed the Members that, during the refurbishment of the Ulster Hall, the Mullholland Organ had remained in the building protected by two layers of polythene sheets and a horizontal timber screen.  However, a small quantity of water had seeped into the instrument and it had not been possible to establish exactly how this situation had occurred.  Mr. Stelfox pointed out that the main contractor had appointed an independent specialist organ contractor to undertake work to protect the instrument prior to the refurbishment work commencing.  The City Organist indicated that, following the discovery of the water damage, an independent specialist organ advisor from England had examined the Organ and had concluded that, whilst some minor damage had occurred, it could be easily remedied at minor expense.

            In answer to a Member’s questions, the City Organist indicated that, in his opinion, the Organ had been protected in the best way possible during the refurbishment of the Hall.  However, since the instrument had been sitting in a cold and damp building for two years, whilst the refurbishment was being undertaken, it was to be expected that some work would have to be undertaken to it and the costs of carrying out such work had been included within the costs of refurbishing the building.  He indicated that it would take between five and seven days to tune  ...  view the full minutes text for item 2.