Minutes:
(Mr. J. Nelson, Community Services Co-ordinator, attended in connection with this item.)
The Committee considered the undernoted report:
“Relevant Background Information
The Grant Aid Policy ‘A Guide to Grant Aid for Community Organisations’ was agreed by Council in January 2004. Two of the six grant types contained within the Policy are Revenue Grant and Community Development Project Grant.
1. Revenue Grants
Awards are allocated under three categories or grades towards the running costs of community facilities. Precedence is given to neighbourhood groups demonstrating a broad based programme of activity. The grade of award is determined by the size of the building, programme content, throughput, and current running costs. When applications are received from organisations operating in the same geographical area, assessment is made in relation to potential duplication of programme and target groups including use of a digital mapping process.
The Community & Leisure Services Sub-Committee of 11 May 2004 awarded 77 Revenue Grants for the period 2004-7. Due to the timescale for the Department's Grant Aid Review these awards were subsequently extended for the period 2007-8 and 2008-9 by the Community & Leisure Services Sub-Committees of 5 September 2006 and 8 May 2007 respectively. In extending the contract period the Committee was aware of the potential risk of limiting equality of treatment and opportunity of those organisations which had not had the chance to apply for this grant previously. Subsequently, the Development Committee 12 December 2007 agreed a one off additional allocation to the Revenue Grant budget of £50,000 to allow new applications from groups who had established, or had acquired premises, since the 2003-4 open call.
2. Community Development Project Grants
Project grant awards of up to £500 are available for small scale community projects that contribute to the overarching aim of building the capacity of local people. Specifically projects which:
- Develop the programme of a community building
- Enable new community groups to become established
- Contribute to the organisational costs of community projects
- Support training courses for Committees/Volunteers
An open call for applications is advertised each year in March and October.
Key Issues
1. Revenue Grants
A total of 10 Revenue Grants were received by the submission date of 1 March 2008.
Applications have been assessed under the same due processes as applied to those received at the previous application date of October 2003. In addition to the general eligibility criteria for this grant, Groups have had to demonstrate that they meet the specific additional criteria as agreed by the Development Committee December 2007. Four applications have been recommended for funding to the cumulative amount of £20,031.63. These are listed at Appendix 1. Six applications have been recommended for rejection and these are listed and the reasons for rejection given at Appendix 1.
Where an application for Revenue funding is rejected by Committee, the applicant Group is notified of its right of appeal in relation to this decision. Any appeals submitted will be considered by Committee at a subsequent meeting.
2. Project Grants
A total of 64 Project Grant applications were received by the submission date 1 March 2008. Fifty six applications have been recommended for funding to the cumulative amount of £31,936. These are listed at Appendix 2. Eight applications are recommended for rejection for the reasons listed at Appendix 2.
Both grant types have been assessed within current agreed eligibility criteria, and there is no equality or environmental implications. Where possible, it is intended that Development Staff will offer support to those groups not recommended for funding in order to assist them to improve practice and reapply for grant aid support at a later stage.
Resource Implications
Financial
The budget for Revenue awards is agreed as £50,000 so recommendations are within the maximum additional allocation agreed by Committee.
The available current Community Development Project Grant budget category is £55,166 so recommendations are within budget limits.
Human Resources
There is no additional staff resource required other than those normally deployed in the administration and assessment of this grant category.
Asset and Other Implications
There is no impact on any physical BCC asset.
Recommendations
Members are requested to approve the recommendations in respect of Revenue Grants at Appendix 1 and Community Development Project Grants as attached at Appendix 2. Members should note that the recommendation in regard to Community Development Project Grant application number 995 (Ligoniel Improvement Association) is subject to specific additional assurances being supplied by the Organisation. These assurances are in relation to the possible consequences to the Organisation of alleged irregular financial activities. Payment of this award will progress only upon receipt of these assurances.
Documents Attached
Appendix 1 – Revenue Grant Applications
Appendix 2 – Project Grant Applications”
APPENDIX 1
REVENUE GRANTS MARCH 08
Table 1: Recommendations for Grant Approval
NAME OF GROUP
|
REQUEST |
GRADE |
RECOMMENDED |
COMMENT |
North |
|
|
|
|
North Belfast Women’s Initiative & Support Project |
£4,140 |
1 |
£3,601.63 |
Maximum award amount for Grade 1 (08/09 figure) |
East |
|
|
|
|
Lower Castlereagh Community Group |
£2,206 |
1 |
£2,206 |
|
Willowfield Parish |
£10,894 |
3 |
£10,894 |
|
West |
|
|
|
|
Glencolin Residents |
£3,330 |
1 |
£3,330 |
|
TOTAL |
£20,570 |
|
£20,031.63 |
|
Table 2: Recommendations for Rejection
|
REQUEST |
REASON FOR REJECTION
|
North |
|
|
Ligoniel Improvement Association |
£30,200 |
Premises acquired prior to the eligible period of 2003-4 |
Sailortown Cultural & Historical Society |
£3,631 |
Not a broad based programme |
|
REQUEST |
REASON FOR REJECTION |
South |
|
|
Annadale & Haywood Residents Association |
£3,550 |
Not a broad based programme |
Greater Village Regeneration Trust |
£12,560 |
Group already approved for Revenue Grant for current period (08/09) |
Village Focus Group |
£9,650 |
Not a broad based programme No evidence of financial systems No annual report |
East |
|
|
Crossroads |
£2,995 |
Not a broad based programme |
APPENDIX 2
|
||
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GRANTS MARCH 2008
Table 3: Recommendations for Grant Approval
|
||
NAME OF GROUP
|
REQUEST
|
REC
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
Basement Youth Club |
£500 |
£500 |
Brookvale Seniors |
£550 |
£500 |
Corner House Cross Community |
£500 |
£500 |
Donegall Park Avenue Community Assoc. |
£750 |
£500 |
Grapevine Seniors |
£500 |
£500 |
Indian Community Centre |
£700 |
£500 |
Ligoniel Improvement Association |
£486 |
£486 |
Lower Oldpark Community Association |
£500 |
£500 |
Lower Oldpark Fellowship Club |
£500 |
£500 |
Midland Art Club |
£500 |
£500 |
Midland Senior Citizens |
£500 |
£500 |
Mountainview Pensioners |
£500 |
£500 |
Shore Crescent Friendship Club |
£500 |
£500 |
Trinity and New Lodge Senior Citizens |
£500 |
£500 |
Upper North Belfast C.E.P. |
£500 |
£500 |
Whitecity CDA |
£500 |
£500 |
NAME OF GROUP |
REQUEST |
REC |
Whitecity CDA Over 50's Club |
£568 |
£500 |
Whitecity Parent & Toddler |
£500 |
£500 |
Woodvale Young At Heart |
£500 |
£500 |
WoodvaleMens Group |
£500 |
£500 |
Sub Total |
£10,554 |
£9,986 |
|
|
|
South |
|
|
Greater Village Regeneration Trust |
£500 |
£500 |
Lower Ormeau & Botanic Environmental Grp. |
£500 |
£500 |
Sandy Row Residents Association |
£940 |
£500 |
St John Viannie Senior Citizens |
£500 |
£500 |
Sub Total |
£2,440 |
£2,000 |
|
|
|
City Centre |
|
|
Belfast Pride |
£1,500 |
£500 |
Sub Total |
£1,500 |
£500 |
|
|
|
East |
|
|
Ardcarn Residents Association |
£500 |
£500 |
Ballymac Centre |
£500 |
£500 |
Belles of Belmont |
£500 |
£500 |
Bridge Roslyn Street Youth Club |
£500 |
£500 |
Bridge - LaganVillage |
£500 |
£500 |
Clarawood Community Association |
£500 |
£500 |
Walkway Community Centre |
£500 |
£500 |
WandsworthComm Association |
£500 |
£500 |
Sub Total |
£8,000 |
£8,000 |
|
|
|
West |
|
|
Ardmonagh Family & Community Centre |
£500 |
£500 |
An Munia Tober |
£500 |
£500 |
Blackie Community Centre |
£500 |
£500 |
Clonard/Springfield Senior Citizens |
£1,500 |
£500 |
Conway Youth Centre |
£500 |
£500 |
Conway Pensioners Group |
£500 |
£500 |
Falls Resident Association |
£3,200 |
£500 |
Friends of Fruithill |
£500 |
£500 |
Glencolin Residents Assoc |
£450 |
£450 |
Gortna Monagh Historical Society |
£600 |
£500 |
Holy Trinity Monday Club |
£700 |
£500 |
Ionaduibh Eachach |
£500 |
£500 |
Link Womens Group |
£500 |
£500 |
Link Youth & Young Adults |
£500 |
£500 |
Middle Andersonstown Festival Ctte. |
£500 |
£500 |
NAME OF GROUP
|
REQUEST |
REC |
Newhill Youth & Community |
£500 |
£500 |
Sliabh Dub Residents Association |
£500 |
£500 |
Stadium Projects |
£500 |
£500 |
Southlink Day Centre |
£500 |
£500 |
Thursday Lunch Club Senior Citizens |
£500 |
£500 |
Whiterock/Westrock Residents |
£500 |
£500 |
West Belfast Athletic & Cultural |
£500 |
£500 |
West Belfast Suicide Awareness |
£1,200 |
£500 |
Sub Total |
£16,150 |
£11,450 |
|
|
|
Total |
£38,644 |
£31,936 |
Table 4: Recommendations for Refusal
NAME OF GROUP |
REQUEST |
REASON FOR REJECTION
|
North |
|
|
Manor Street/Cliftonville Community Centre |
£500 |
Late Submission – 4 March 2008 |
Thornbush Hearing Impaired Pensioners |
£500 |
No Group bank account |
South |
|
|
N.I. Community Addition Service |
£500 |
Organisation outside Belfast boundary Not a Community Development Organisation
|
South BelfastMalecare |
£500 |
No evidence of financial systems No A.G.M. minutes |
East |
|
|
Belfast Photo Imaging Club |
£500 |
Not a Community Development Organisation |
Steadfast Association |
£500 |
Organisation outside Belfast boundary |
West |
|
|
Careers & Kids |
£500 |
Not a Community Development Organisation |
Clonard/Springfield Parent/Youth Group |
£1,400 |
Application incomplete” |
During discussion in the matter, a Member drew the Committee’s attention to an application from the Steadfast Association for a Community Development Project Grant which was being recommended for refusal because the organisation was located outside the Belfast boundary. He pointed out that, whilst the Association’s secretary lived outside Belfast, the organisation undertook work within the City. In response, the Community Services Co-ordinator indicated that the address which had been given on the application form had been outside the Belfast boundary and that the form indicated that much of the work undertaken by the Association was outside Belfast City Council’s area. Accordingly, it had been recommended that the grant be refused.
After further discussion the Committee agreed to defer consideration of the request from the Steadfast Association to enable further information to be provided and adopted the other recommendations set out above.
Supporting documents: